Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01478
Original file (BC 2013 01478.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
                       RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
         AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:	DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2013-01478

			COUNSEL:  NONE 

			HEARING DESIRED: NO

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His records be changed to show that:

1.  He included his wife as the beneficiary on his Reserve 
Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP).  

2.  He selected option C, immediate coverage.  

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

1.  As a member of the Air Force Reserve, he hit his 20-year 
mark on 10 February 2001.  He was single at that time and heavy 
into training and deploying with his Security Forces Squadron.  
He has no knowledge of receiving any package, 20-year letter 
with instructions pertaining to RCSBP, or retirement information 
in the mail or email at that time.  After 11 September 2001, he 
worked man-days at the base for the heightened security until he 
was activated under Title 10 orders on 9 November 2001.  In 
August 2002, he deployed to Kuwait until December 2002.  Upon 
his return, he married his fiancée on 14 December 2002.  He 
continued to work the heightened security at the base until his 
orders ended in June 2003.  He was not aware that his marriage 
changed his RCSBP retirement benefits.  He was not advised of 
the change by the base customer service office when his wife was 
enrolled in the Defense Enrollment Eligibility Reporting System 
(DEERS)and added to his Service member Group Life Insurance 
(SGLI).  Upon his retirement on 13 August 2012, he was informed 
that he had one year from the date of marriage to declare his 
wife to the Air Reserve Personnel Center (ARPC) and make a 
change to his RCSBP beneficiary election.

2.  He requests a change in his RCSBP election to include his 
spouse and option C, immediate coverage, in the event of his 
death.  He does not believe it is fair to have missed the chance 
to make a change to his RCSBP election from no dependents at the 
20-year point to spouse coverage, option C, when he did not 
receive any information identifying the requirement to notify 
ARPC for life altering events.

In support of his request, the applicant provides copies of his 
marriage license, notification of retirement eligibility letter, 
retirement order, and his 2001 thru 2003 DD From 214, 
Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty.  

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A. 

________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

According to documents extracted from the automated records 
management system (ARMS), the applicant enlisted in the Air 
Force Reserve on 10 February 1981.  On 13 August 2012, he was 
released from his, then, current assignment and assigned to the 
HQ ARPC Retired Reserve section and placed on the Retired 
Reserve List awaiting retirement at age 60 (3 August 2019).  

________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

ARPC/DPTTR recommends denial.  DPTTR states the applicant was 
notified of his eligibility to participate in the RCSBP on 
21 May 2001, via certified mail.  The election package was sent to 
the applicant's address and was signed for, by someone other than 
the applicant, on 30 May 2001.  He did not make an election and as 
prescribed by Title 10 U.S.C. §1448, he was automatically enrolled 
into Option A, "Decline to Make an Election Until Age 60" 
effective 28 August 2001.  The applicant’s record reflected he had 
no dependents at that time.  

The applicant was married on 14 December 2002.  In accordance with 
(I(AW) Title 10 U.S.C. §1448 (a)(5)(B), Manner and Time of 
Election, – “Such an election must be written, signed by the 
person making the election, and received by the Secretary 
concerned within one year after the date on which that person 
marries or acquires that dependent child.”  The applicant did not 
notify them of his marriage within the one-year timeframe as 
dictated by law.  

The complete ARPC/DPTTR evaluation, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit C.  

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the 
applicant on 19 April 2013 for review and comment within 30 days 
(Exhibit C).  To date, a response has not been received.  

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice warranting 
corrective action in regard to the applicant’s election of 
Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan, spouse coverage.  We 
took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging 
the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and 
recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility 
and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that 
neither the applicant nor the spouse submitted a valid election 
within the one-year period required by law to establish spouse 
coverage.  Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the 
contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief 
sought in this application.

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that 
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and 
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the 
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered 
with this application.

________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered this application 
in Executive Session on 23 December 2013, under the provisions 
of AFI 36-2603:

		, Chair
		, Member
		, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered in AFBCMR 
Docket Number BC-2013-01478:

    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149 dated 19 March 2013, w/atchs.
    Exhibit C.  Letter, ARPC/DPTT, dated 17 April 2013, w/atchs.
    Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 19 April 2013. 




                                   
                                   Panel Chair





Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00051

    Original file (BC 2014 00051.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    STATEMENT OF FACTS: The RCSBP Information Package that was mailed to the applicant at his initial election point stated: “If you do not have a spouse or dependent children at the time you are entitled to make an RCSBP election, but later acquire a spouse or children, you may elect RCSBP coverage for that spouse or children within one year of acquisition.” AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPTT recommends denial based on the applicant not making the update within one year of his marriage as...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05467

    Original file (BC 2012 05467.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05467 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. His records be corrected to reflect he made a timely election for RCSBP coverage for his spouse. Although the applicant indicated he was not properly advised in regards to his RCSBP option until after the automatic election was made, the RCSBP...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-03146

    Original file (BC-2008-03146.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    He made no election during that time and was automatically enrolled in Option A, “Deferred election until age 60.” In 1995, the applicant was divorced from his former spouse and during an open enrollment in 1999 through 2000, he elected to participate with an election of Option CJ, “immediate annuity for child only.” In 2002, he was married to his current spouse. He would like his current spouse listed as the beneficiary under RCSBP. He completed all the required paperwork at that...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05474

    Original file (BC 2013 05474.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 21 Mar 11, his son was born and he turned in his son’s birth certificate for update in DEERS. Since he had not been married before and was still on Active Reserves, he was told there was nothing else needed and DEERS was updated. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that that the application will only be...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00689

    Original file (BC-2012-00689.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant acknowledged that he was not informed about providing his marriage certificate nor completing the required paperwork to designate his eligible dependents for RCSBP coverage but he believed his spouse and stepdaughter were covered under the RCSBP program at that time. 2 because of his election automatic ARPC was not notified of the birth of his son within one year of the event as required by law. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-01704

    Original file (BC-2013-01704.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-01704 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to show he made a timely election for spouse coverage under the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP). To date, a response has not been received (Exhibit C). We took notice of the applicant's complete...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05866

    Original file (BC 2013 05866.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    According to Title 10 USC § 1448(a) the member may “ elect to discontinue participation in the Plan at any time during the one-year period beginning on the second anniversary of the date on which payment of retired pay to the participant commences.” At this time, the member can choose to decline SBP coverage, however; the member will still be responsible for the RCSBP portion of the coverage. Exhibit B. Exhibit E. Letter, Applicant, dated 25 Sep 14.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05388

    Original file (BC 2013 05388.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: Her deceased husband and she thought they had complied with the marriage reporting requirements of the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP), when their marriage data was entered in the Defense Enrollment Eligibility Reporting System (DEERS) upon being issued new military ID cards on 4 Feb 11, less than two months after being married on 16 Dec 10. ARPC/DPTT has no record of the deceased member or his spouse reporting the marital change within the required...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00383

    Original file (BC 2014 00383.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He elected RCSBP child coverage. The applicant believes the Board should find it in the interest of justice to consider his untimely application as he was unaware he had to elect SBP spouse coverage within one year of marriage. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that that the application...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05185

    Original file (BC 2013 05185.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He made his RCSBP election when he entered retired status. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has failed to sustain his burden of proof that he has been the victim of an error or injustice. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be...